Cases tagged as Crime under $5000

• R. v. M.M.2017

  The client was charged with theft under $5000. The file was referred to Alternative Measures and was withdrawn after successful completion of the requirements.

  Crime under $5000 Theft

• R. v. L.S.2017

  The client was charged with the indictable offence of theft over $5000. Ms. Karpa was able to convince the crown to lay a new information with separate theft under $5000 counts, so that they would be summary offences, thereby allowing a conditional sentence outcome and no real jail. The client hacond to pay full restitution and received a conditional sentence order of 18 months, followed by 12 months'’ probation. Normally, these types of offences would garner real jail.

  Crime under $5000 Theft Probation Crime over $5000

• R. v. R.S.2017

  The client was charged with theft under $5000. The matter was referred to the Alternative Measures Program and upon completion of the requirements, the charge was successfully withdrawn.

  Crime under $5000 Theft

• R. v. E.D.2016

  The client was charged with theft under $5000, failing to appear for fingerprinting, failing to attend court and being intoxicated in a public place. The client was adamant that this was a case of mistaken identity, as he never lived in Calgary, and was not in the city at the time of the offences. Ms. Karpa was successful in negotiating with the crown on that basis that the charges should be withdrawn.

  Crime under $5000 Theft Causing a Disturbance Administrative Offences

• R. v. M.M.2016

  The client was charged with theft under $5000.00, breaking & entering, mischief and trespassing at night. The Crown agreed to refer the matter to the Alternative Measures Program under the guise of it being a lesser included offence of unlawfully in a dwelling house, and the charge was eventually dropped after successful completion of the same.

  Crime under $5000 Mischief Theft Property Offences

• R. v. B.C.2016

  The client was charged with mischief to property under $5000. He plead guilty to the offence and received probation due to a related record.

  Crime under $5000 Mischief

• R. v. I.C.2016

  The client was charged with fraud over $5000 and theft over $5000 from an employer. Ms. Karpa worked diligently with the client to show the crown that the allegations were unfounded, and a matter of a civil case versus a criminal case. Normally, this type of matter would garner a sentence of jail if convicted or if found guilty. The matter was withdrawn by the crown after Ms. Karpa met with them and reviewed the detailed documents prepared in support of the client'’s assertions.

  Crime under $5000 Theft Fraud Crime over $5000

• R. v. B.S.2016

  The client was initially charged with sexual assault. Though this was originally an indictable offence, the information was re-laid and Ms. Karpa convinced the crown to re-elect summarily. At that time the client was charged with sexual assault, obtaining for consideration sexual services, and fraud under $5000. He plead guilty to fraud over $5000 and a conditional discharge was granted.

  Sexual Assault Crime under $5000 Fraud Conditional Discharge Prostitution

• R. v. G.H.2016

  The client was charged with the robbery of a convenience store employee. The matter would have garnered a jail sentence of three years'’. Ms. Karpa was able to secure a reduced plea to assault with a weapon and theft under $5000.00 for a conditional discharge. The client did not have to spent any time in jail.

  Weapons Crime under $5000 Conditional Discharge Robbery

• R. v. J.H.2016

  The client was charged with shoplifting (theft under $5000.00). Ms. Karpa was successful in having the charge against the client withdrawn so that the client would not have a criminal record.

  Crime under $5000 Theft

• R. v. M.G.2016

  The client was charged with shoplifting (theft under $5000.00). Ms. Karpa was able to have the charge against the client withdrawn, despite the crown initially not agreeing to do so.

  Crime under $5000 Theft

• R. v. T.G.2016

  The client was charged with fraud under $5000.00 in relation to switching price tags on an item in a store. Ms. Karpa was able to successfully argue that the charge should be withdrawn.

  Crime under $5000 Fraud

• R. v. M.Y.2016

  The client was charged with theft under $5000.00 (shoplifting). Ms. Karpa had the charge against the client withdrawn.

  Crime under $5000 Theft

• R. v. N.K.2016

  The client was charged with shoplifting (theft under $5000.00). Ms. Karpa had the charge against her client withdrawn.

  Crime under $5000 Theft

• R. v. P.P.2016

  The client was charged with theft under $5000.00. The charge against the client was withdrawn by the crown.

  Crime under $5000 Theft

• R. v. S.N.2016

  he client was charged with theft under $500.00 and failure to appear in court. The charges were withdrawn. No record. No conviction.

  Crime under $5000 Theft

• R. v. M.O.2016

  The client was charged with theft under $5000.00 (shoplifting). The matter was withdrawn for successful completion of Alternative Measures.

  Crime under $5000 Theft

• R. v. M.Q.2016

  The client was charged with theft under $5000.00 and failing to appear at court. The matter involved a domestic dispute wherein the complainant alleged the theft of a telephone. Initially the crown would not agree to the referral to Alternative Measures, but Ms, Karpa convinced them to do so. Ms. Karpa secured the withdrawal of the charges after the matter was referred to Alternative Measures.

  Crime under $5000 Theft Administrative Offences

• R. v. R.G.2016

  The client was charged with theft under $5000.00 for shoplifting from a local grocery store. The client was referred to the Alternative Measures Program. Upon successful completion, Ms. Karpa had the charge withdrawn. No criminal record/no criminal conviction.

  Crime under $5000 Theft

• R. v. J.M.2016

  The client was charged with theft under $5000.00 (shoplifting). Ms. Karpa had the charge withdrawn. No criminal record/no criminal conviction.

  Crime under $5000 Theft

• R. v. A.F.2016

  The client was charged with theft under $5000.00 (shoplifting). The matter was referred to the Alternative Measures Program and the charge was dropped after successful completion of the same.

  Crime under $5000 Theft

• R. v. J.B.2016

  The client was charged with theft under $5000.00 (section 334(B) of the Criminal Code of Canada) in relation to a shoplifting allegation. The charge was withdrawn.

  Crime under $5000 Theft

• R. v. M.C.2016

  The client was charged with theft under $5000.00 for shoplifting. The charge was withdrawn.

  Crime under $5000 Theft

• R. v. J.W.2016

  The client was charged with theft under $5000.00 for shoplifting. Ms. Karpa had the matter referred to Alternative Measures and the charge was withdrawn. No criminal conviction/no criminal record.

  Crime under $5000 Theft

• R. v. S.Y.2016

  The client was charged with theft under $5000.00 (shoplifting). The matter was referred to the Alternative Measures Program and the charge was dropped after successful completion of the same. No criminal record/no conviction.

  Crime under $5000 Theft