What are the sentencing considerations for Indigenous offenders?

Susan Karpa Criminal Lawyer in CalgaryIf you have been charged or are being investigated, hiring a Calgary criminal defence lawyer is important. I can explain the strategy for fighting these charges, the repercussions of a guilty plea, the nature of a peace bond if applicable, and other related aspects of your charges. Contact us now at 587-888-7149 for a free consultation.

What are the sentencing considerations for Indigenous offenders?

The decision-making surrounding the sentencing of Indigenous individuals convicted of crimes bears unique considerations. Canada's judicial framework aims to rectify the overrepresentation of Indigenous communities within its confines, promoting fairness and equity. Sentencing judges in Alberta must take into account these unique considerations.


In 1999 the Supreme Court of Canada decided the case of R. v. Gladue. The Supreme Court set guidelines for what the courts must consider when sentencing Indigenous offenders. This involves recognizing the historic and systemic factors tied to their actions, including the lasting effects of residential institutions, cultural displacements, and inherited traumas 


A Gladue Report will be prepared for sentencing for Indigenous offenders. The report will be written by someone who is Indigenous and who has the experience and background to write the reports. The report will delve into an Indigenous offender’s personal history, familial lineage, cultural affiliations, and the shadow of colonialism in their life journey. Such insights guide judges to make decisions that respect the individual's Indigenous heritage and life experiences.

Other Gladue factors that may be considered include:

  • Colonization.
  • Racism.
  • Foster Care.
  • Abuse.
  • Poverty.
  • Indian Residential School and Indian Day School attendance.


For Indigenous offenders, legal determinations should be holistic, considering the vibrant mosaic of traditions, ethos, and convictions central to these societies. An effective justice system acknowledges that standardized measures might not always yield just or rehabilitative outcomes. 

Indigenous societies possess inherent methods for resolving disputes and fostering rehabilitation. These methodologies stress mutual accountability and community engagement. By harnessing these time-tested reparative traditions, the criminal justice system can navigate towards outcomes that honor cultural nuances.

There is a growing awareness in legal circles regarding the undeniable advantages of methods steeped in restorative justice. Such strategies prioritize amends over retribution, emphasizing the healing of fractured relationships. They are also committed to discerning and addressing the deep-seated triggers of criminal conduct, championing the person's re-integration into society in a productive fashion.


For Indigenous offenders, the emphasis in legal decisions also shifts from just punishment to rehabilitative. The focus should rest on their comprehensive recovery and re-integration into their native communities, acknowledging the individuality rooted in their cultural and communal affiliations.

The bedrock of Indigenous societies is their resilient communal ties, enriched by age-old customs, collective values, and rituals. These bonds are instrumental in the therapeutic journey. By capitalizing on this robust cultural infrastructure, the judicial system has a chance to address not just the immediate misconduct but also the deeper socioeconomic and personal issues leading to it.

Encouraging these cultural ties and adopting community-driven redressal mechanisms can substantially lower reoffending risks. Research and experiential data suggest that Indigenous culprits, when wrapped in their community's support and guided to rectify their wrongs, seldom fall back into criminal patterns. This not only uplifts the individual but also amplifies the collective health and equilibrium of the entire community.

However, it is crucial to note that while these principles aim to guide judges in their sentencing deliberations, challenges persist in ensuring their consistent application within Canada's justice framework. Yet, the ongoing efforts to weave Indigenous perspectives into legal protocols reflect a commitment to address past wrongs and champion equitable outcomes for Indigenous individuals.